Saturday, May 9, 2015

A raisin in the sun and it's gender studies

A Raisin in the Sun and its gender studies
    In A Raisin in the Sun Gender roles are very distinguished from character to character and age seems to play a role in this as well. I feel that Gender roles appear to be very traditional in this play.  In the setting of this play you can tell that women are starting to break free of the stereotype that they are born to be housewives and take care of there young. Majority of men find female roles to be basic and traditional, women should not break away from what they were meant to do in a man’s point of view. Depending on the age of the female character can determine their outlook on gender role, younger females are trying to become something more then what is expected in the time they want to be able to support themselves and their family which can be difficult for a man to see as the normal thing to do.
    Describing the characteristic of Traditional vs. nontraditional gender roles a raisin in the sun leans more towards traditional. The play follows the standards of the time era where females catered to men, men made the money of the house and color overruled all. In the beginning of the play Ruth has breakfast ready in the morning for the family and is expected to clean the house while Walter goes to work and their son attends school. This was the typical responsibilities of a family. Mama feels that the women should do all the work in the home, an example of this would be when mama says “Well- he’s a little boy. Aint supposed to know ‘bout housekeeping. My baby, that what he is what you fix for his breakfast this morning?” (1.1 34). Mama is implying that men dont do house work and ensuring he was cooked a proper breakfast prior to going to school. Beneatha on the other hand is rebelling and going against what everyone sees as the norm in gender roles. Beneatha wants to go to college and become a doctor. Walter being an antifeminist he has a difficult time believing this. Walter states “who the hell told you you had to be a doctor? if you so crazy ‘bout messing round with sick people then go be a nurse like other women - or just get married and be quit…”(1.1 38) This is demining bearnetha because she feels strongly about becoming a doctor and doesn’t want to bow down to societies views on the traditional woman.
    Gender stereotypes are very typical in this play. Men are still in strong power over women. Walter feels like Ruth should automatically support every decision he makes due to him being empowered as a male he feels that Ruth should not have a seperate opinion. As walter explains clearly
That’s it. There you are. Man say to his women: I got me a dream. His woman say: Eat your eggs. Man say: I got to take hold of this here world, baby! And a woman will say: Eat your eggs and go to work. Man say: I got to change my life, I’m choking to death, baby! And his woman say - Your eggs is getting cold (1.1 33-34).
Ruth knows better than to take Walter for his word when it comes to dreams associated with money but Walter feels that Ruth should be behind his other word and if her opinion is different then it simply isn’t right. This seems to almost be the norm for this era where men confide in their women to simply hear what they want to hear and be supported whether the decision is right or wrong.
    The relationships between different genders can depend on the age of the character.

Housing inequality

Housing Inequality
     Housing inequality can be related to wealth wether it is in regards to wealth of the city, wealth of the citizens or household income. This can all play a major role in housing inequality. First you must understand what housing inequality is to understand why wealth plays such a big role. By definition “housing inequality is the difference in the quality of housing that exists within a given society” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/housing_inequality)
    In the united states we show a wider separation between rich and poor than any other nation. We emphasize our daily lives of wealth and income that this can control individuals. When looking at housing inequality you need to break it down starting at the location. What is the community like is it a safe close community that is well taken care of or is it a distant community that each individual fends for themselves. Is there good schooling, do you have large shopping centers and do you have parks and recreation for children to be a part of. The quality of housing is such a neighborhood would be greater than that of a neglected area.
    When it comes to the citizens of housing, wealth tends to lead back to race of the community and the Great Recession. As explained by Gene Demby “Just last year, the census revealed, that whites had about 22 times the wealth of African-Americans and 15 times the wealth of Latinos — and those numbers only got worse over the last five years during the Great Recession.” Then mentioned in another article “The typical white family held a net worth six times greater than the typical black family at the end of the 20th century. That gap has now doubled. The wealth gap between white and Hispanic households has widened as well.” It seems to appear the white families are wealthier than those of African Americans and or Latinos.
    Where you live has a lot to do with your profession and the household income. Typically 

neighborhoods with expensive housing, safer parks and recreactions and well keep land will have 

residents living there who have a higher paying job and a higher household income. Now this may 

be my personal observation

Oochigeaskw - The Rough-Faced Girl, A tale of Cinderella


Oochigeaskw – The Rough-Faced Girl, A tale of Cinderella
As Maria Tatar explains “Fairy tales are up close and personal, telling us about the quest for romance and riches, for power and privilege, and, most important, for a way out of the woods back to the safety and security of home”. (Writing and reading across the curriculum, 231) A fairy tale should be one that a child enjoys hearing, learns from and can get some grasps of what is right and wrong. In “Oochigeaskw – The rough-faced girl” all of the listed criteria’s to an educational fairy tale are in the story at some point. This is a fairy tale that I would highly recommend to those parents seeking a small story to read with educational purpose.
        In the tale “Oochigeaskw – The Rough-Faced Girl”, the author whom remains anonymous, decides to place the setting of this fairy tale in a native tribe. Now I know you have all read “Cinderella” and are aware this is in a completely different setting. The story its self resembles “Cinderella” for several reasons, it has the same conflicts, same rewards and same criteria’s explained by Tatar. In this version of Cinderella, Oochigeaskw who represents Cinderella is still given a rough up bringing by suffering due to her evil stepsisters. She is set with life challenges of being given a life of poverty, chores and obstacles put before her. In this story however, the prince is not your everyday prince, he is invisible and the one lucky girl to truly see him will become his wife, Sound familiar. As this story tale ends Oochigeaskw ends up seeing the invisible one and her misfortune is taken away where she lives a life of peace and happiness.
    Arthur Schlesinger believes that “human nature is not innately good”. In “Oochigeaskw – The Rough-Faced Girl” this is shown throughout the story, Some examples of this would be when the author describes how the sister of the invisible one would take the girls from the village on walks, the sister would then ask the girls “Do you see my Brother” Majority would say yes, the girls were lying, they could not see the invisible one but were saying they could due to being gready and wanting wealth and marriage. (Anonymous, 246) Also stated in the text the youngest sister, Oochigeaskw was tormented by her oldest sister who would burn her hands and feet with hot cinders. When Oochigeaskw would leave the house villagers would yell out at her “shame” due to her appearance. (247) All three of these examples show how “human nature is not innately good” from lying, torture and misjudgment.
    Schlesinger feels “That conflict is real” when it comes to fairy tale criteria. In the tale “Oochigeaskw – The Rough-Faced Girl” conflicts are presented throughout the entire tale. First conflict which relates to most versions of “Cinderella” has to deal with the loss of a mother. Oochigeaskw is forced to grow up with her father and evil sisters. Without a mother figure the sisters do not have stability and present their own conflict. The conflict between Oochigeaskw and her oldest sister is one of heartache and in a sense torture. The oldest sister treats Oochigeaskw poorly by burning her hands with hot cinders and lying to their father about it saying that Oochigeaskw was falling into the fire. (246) unfortunately there is neglect and abuse that happen in this country, when this happens there should always be away out, Oochigeaskw finds her way out in this happy ending. Another act of conflict is how poor Oochigeaskw is faced with not having any type of wealth since whatever her father brings how the older sister get first pick. Oochigeaskw walks around barefoot until one day she takes a few of the extra shells to make an outfit out of this she found in the woods, her father’s old moccasins which she soaked in water to soften them for her to wear even then they were too big, and she tried her luck at seeing the invisible one.
    The third characteristic given by Schlesinger is “that life is harsh before it is happy” This is true is more ways than one in our own life and in this version of “Cinderella”. The entire story behind “Cinderella is that this girl lost her father, was forced to grown up with her evil step sisters and made to do the petty work around the house, wear the rags and scraps of clothes in the house and forced to stay hidden from the outside world. All of this harshness led to Cinderella ending her tale of great sorrow to happiness and wealth. In this tale of “Oochigeaskw – The Rough-Faced Girl” Oochigeaskw is faced with very harsh treatment from her older sister, she is looked down upon from the entire village because of her appearance, which was caused by her oldest sister. After years of having to look and feel the way Oochigeaskw did she tried her luck at seeing the invisible one. To her surprise when she entered the woods and found the sister she did in fact see the invisible one.  When asked “what is his sled-string?” Oochigeaskw replied “It is the rainbow” the sister then asked “What is the bow-string” Oochigeaskw then told the sister “It is the spirits road – the Milky Way” (247) The sister new at that time she could see her brother and that her heart was pure and true. Once this was discovered the sister took the girl home and gave her a bath to clean her. As soon as she started washing Oochigeaskw her scars started disappearing and her true beauty was shown inside and out. Oochigeaskw’s life was hard and never ending in her eyes, she had to endure this harshness prior to her happiness. Those who deserve it, it will come.
    In conclusion Oochigeaskw was offered the wife’s seat and Oochigeaskw was pronounced his wife. She was able to leave her life of sorrow for one of happiness and did not have to turn back. Even though Oochigeaskw went through everything in the beginning that seemed uncalled for or harsh it made her the person she turned out to be. She new the value of life and that no matter what in the end good will come to those who deserve and wait. I feel that this is a great read for children that may have a sense of failure or heartache in their own lives. It may be able to help those who need a little up lifting and show them that things can change and to keep striving for goodness. This version of Cinderella shows all of Schlesinger’s Characteristics for fairy tales very well. I feel that this story is a true fairy tale one that your child would love to read.

Should veterens with PTSD be exempt from the death penalty?

     Should veterens with PTSD be exempt from the death penalty?

     Would you say that all murders have some sort of mental illness, which then excuses them from certain crimes? In “Should Veterans with PTSD Be Exempt from the Death Penalty” by Iulia Filip, Lulia explains how in one case a man by the name of Andrew Brannan was involved with a traffic stop for speeding in 1998. When pulled over Andrew proceeded to get out of his car, use profanities and shot the deputy nine times. This became the first death sentence carried out in 2015.
       Andrew Brannan was diagnosed with PTSD which was caused from his service in Vietnam as well as being Bipolar that was later on diagnosed. As explained in the article “PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) is a severe mental disorder that can affect intellectual and adaptive functioning, trigger flashbacks to traumatic events, and impair one’s judgment”. There is also a statistic that shows those who served in Iraq and Afghanistan were 20 percent likely to be diagnosed with PTSD and those who served in Vietnam are 30 percent likely to be diagnosed with PTSD. This ends up being a significant number of individuals with this diagnosis. However it is said that majority of these veterans diagnosed with PTSD are not in fact violent.
       Andrew Brannan, prior to this conviction, was diagnosed with this disorder and had been hospitalized on several occasions. He was accepted through disability for his mental status due to the time he spent in Vietnam. Brannan was diagnosed with having bipolar disorder. Years pasted and he became very sheltered from the world and only talked to other vets, he even lived in a tight quarters that reminded him of a war zone bunker. He was beginning to let the disorders take over his life and control him with out intensentions of doing so Brannan was making his disorder worse.
               Brannan’s story is just one of many. In 2009 an Iraq veteran was found guilty for murder and was tried as legally insane. Brannan did not receive the death penalty he did however received 25 years in maximum security. He was then release in 2014 after mental analysis determined him to no longer have PTSD. In another case In 2009 John Darrell Thuesen killed his brother and girlfriend and now is on death row and Eddie Routh is facing the death penalty for murdering a Navy Seal sniper, he is currently trying to plead insanity. These are just some documented cases with all different outcomes. Not ever PTSD related convicted has resulted in the death penalty.
               As said several times throughout this article “PTSD as an insanity defense in a murder case is hard to use because the person knows the difference between right and wrong” “They are not delusional or psychotic. For example, they do not believe they have killed a Martian instead of a human” The author believes that until there is a complete understanding of PTSD and what can truly come of this disorder then we should not be so quick to judge and execute. In some cases there is more behind a crime then a motive, the individuals state of mind can be compromised when mental disability is at a higher risk.     
      I can see why the author would think that the death penalty should not be used on any one suffering PTSD. An individual suffering from PTSD is considered to have some sort of mental illness. Can he be 100 percent accountable for his actions or is this the illness that took over at that given time. Any other person who has been tried for murder and declared mental ill has been sent to a mental institute or life in prison. Why would someone diagnoses with PTSD be any different.
               Looking more into this article the deputy shot by Brannan was a 22 year old man who was married with a child and one child soon to come. When this deputy went on duty he understands that his life is always on the line and that he must always be 100 percent cautious. We do not know the entire story to this, Did the deputy try to reason with the Brannon, was Brannon going to do this regardless who pulled him over or could this have been handled differently.  We will never know the answers to those questions.
               I feel that in this article the author truly believes that PTSD should be accountable for ones actions when it comes to violence or even murder if they are a veteran. This can be very true in most cases. To someone who has had to witness and act first hand in battle, no one can fully understand what they went through. No one can completely relate to what that person may or may not have had to do to survive. So who’s place is it to say that they are not in some way mentally insane or in some way mentally unstable. Isn’t every murderer in some way mentally unstable, would a perfectly sane person commit such a heinous crime?
               In conclusion when looking at both views it is hard to decide who is right. I myself 
 
cannot say killing that man was in the right only because Brannon was diagnosed with PTSD 
and on the other hand I can’t say the death penalty was just cause for Brannon taking that 
 
young man’s life. In the world we live in today there have been worse crimes committed 
 
without that severe of penalty as Brannon received. We need to be very cautious and very 
 
educated on the issue at hand when ending someone’s life in this manner.  We as people 
 
have lost this coping skill, we go directly to killing, accusing or abuse in one form or 
 
another. Our world is all around becoming more and more determined to fight against each
 
 other and this is only getting worse.